Tumor Seeding Post Nutritional Support Implementation: A Rare Complication; A Scoping Review.

Patients with cancer are at risk of malnutrition because of reduced food intake, thus making oral intake challenging. Thus, nutritional support is used to provide the nutrient requirements. Feeding tube site implantation among patients with cancer has been reported after endoscopic feeding gastrostomy installation. This manuscript aims to further explore this phenomenon using a structured database review. Among 33 seeding cases included in this review, case reports (70 %) were the most common study design, predominantly using percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy via the pull method. The duration between tube implantation and seeding detection ranged from 7.12 ± 3.7 months, with some missing data among the included studies. The most common primary cancer diagnosis was head and neck cancer. Tumor seeding was higher among male patients than that in female patients. However, large-scale, statistically powered studies are needed to further investigate this complication.

Time trends and outcomes of gastrostomy placement in a Swedish national cohort over two decades.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and laparoscopically inserted gastrostomy have become the gold standard for adult patients and children, respectively, requiring long-term enteral nutrition support. Procedure-related mortality is a rare event, often reported to be zero in smaller studies. National data on 30-d mortality and long-term survival rates after gastrostomy placement are scarce in the literature. AIM: To study the use of gastrostomies in Sweden from 1998-2019 and to analyze procedure-related mortality and short-term (< 30 d) and long-term survival. METHODS: In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, individuals that had received a gastrostomy between 1998-2019 in Sweden were included. Individuals were identified in the Swedish National Patient Register, and survival analysis was possible by cross-referencing the Swedish Death Register. The cohort was divided into three age groups: Children (0-18 years); adults (19-64 years); and elderly (≥ 65 years). Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test and Cox regression were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: In total 48682 individuals (52% males, average age 60.9 ± 25.3 years) were identified. The cohort consisted of 12.0% children, 29.5% adults, and 58.5% elderly. An increased use of gastrostomies was observed during the study period, from 13.7/100000 to 22.3/100000 individuals (P < 0.001). The use of PEG more than doubled (about 800 to 1800/year), with a corresponding decrease in open gastrostomy (about 700 to 340/year). Laparoscopic gastrostomy increased more than ten-fold (about 20 to 240/year). Overall, PEG, open gastrostomy, and laparoscopic gastrostomy constituted 70.0% (n = 34060), 23.3% (n = 11336), and 4.9% (n = 2404), respectively. Procedure-related mortality was 0.1% (n = 44) overall (PEG: 0.05%, open: 0.24%, laparoscopic: 0.04%). The overall 30-d mortality rate was 10.0% (PEG: 9.8%, open: 12.4%, laparoscopic: 1.7%) and decreased from 11.6% in 1998-2009 vs 8.5% in 2010-2019 (P < 0.001). One-year and ten-year survival rates for children, adults, and elderly were 93.7%, 67.5%, and 42.1% and 79.9%, 39.2%, and 6.8%, respectively. The most common causes of death were malignancies and cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. CONCLUSION: The annual use of gastrostomies in Sweden increased during the study period, with a shift towards more minimally invasive procedures. Although procedure-related death was rare, the overall 30-d mortality rate was high (10%). To overcome this, we believe that patient selection should be improved.

[Chinese expert consensus on clinical application of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy / jejunostomy (2024 edition)].

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy / jejunostomy (PEG/J) is a relatively safe and effective minimally invasive surgical approach to establish long-term enteral nutrition (EN) channels. Due to the good compliance and the reduced incidence of reflux and aspiration pneumonia, PEG/J is the preferred way for long-term EN and has been widely used in clinical applications. However, few technical guidelines or expert consensus guiding the clinical practice of PEG/J have been published. The formation of "Chinese expert consensus on clinical application of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy / jejunostomy (2024 edition)" is led by the Committee of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Chinese Research Hospital Association. This consensus is based on the latest clinical evidence as well as the clinical experience of Chinese experts. This consensus is divided into PEG/J indications and contraindication, perioperative management, operational techniques, prevention, and treatment of related complications and other issues. All recommendations and their strengths were carried out by expert-voting method and presented as the basic framework of "Recommended Opinions (level of evidence and strength of recommendation) and Summary of Evidence". This consensus is registered on the International Practice Guide Registration Platform (IPGRP-2022CN329).

Prophylactic anti-reflux procedure for children undergoing laparoscopic gastrostomy: Rethinking of the routine practice.

AIM: Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a frequently performed procedure in children requiring long-term enteral nutrition. The role of prophylactic anti-reflux surgery during gastrostomy placements is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate the role of prophylactic anti-reflux procedures during gastrostomy placement. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis of all children without reflux receiving laparoscopic gastrostomy from January 2005 through December 2021 was performed. Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients receiving gastrostomy placement alone and patients receiving gastrostomy with prophylactic anti-reflux surgery. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients had a confirmed absence of reflux by a 24-h pH/impedance study before operation. Thirty-six of these patients underwent prophylactic anti-reflux surgery (PAR) while 43 received gastrostomy (PG) alone. The operative time and conversion rate were significantly higher in the PAR group (140.5 ± 67.5 vs. 80.2 ± 66.8 min, p = 0.0001 and 8.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). There were no major complications in either group. De novo reflux was detected in five patients (11.6%) in the PG group. None of these patients progressed to require anti-reflux surgery. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of de novo reflux after laparoscopic gastrostomy was low and could be managed without anti-reflux surgery. A routine pre-operative pH study is helpful for appropriate patient selection to avoid unnecessary anti-reflux surgery, which lengthens operative time and increases the conversion rate.

Timing and impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a comprehensive analysis.

Dysphagia is common in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, often requiring percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for enteral nutrition. We retrospectively analyzed data from 188 Korean patients with ALS who underwent PEG tube insertion at five-time points: symptom onset (t1), diagnosis (t2), recommended time for gastrostomy (t3), PEG insertion (t4), and one-year post-insertion (t5). The recommended time point for gastrostomy (T-rec for gastrostomy) was defined as the earlier time point between a weight loss of more than 10% and advanced dysphagia indicated by the ALSFRS-R swallowing subscore of 2 or less. The T-rec for gastrostomy was reached at 22 months after symptom onset, followed by PEG insertion at 30 months, resulting in an 8-month delay. During the delay, the ALSFRS-R declined most rapidly at 1.7 points/month, compared to 0.8 points/month from symptom onset to diagnosis, 0.7 points/month from diagnosis to T-rec for gastrostomy, and 0.6 points/month after the PEG insertion. It is crucial to discuss PEG insertion before significant weight loss or severe dysphagia occurs and minimize the delay between the recommended time for gastrostomy and the actual PEG insertion. A stratified and individualized multidisciplinary team approach with careful symptom monitoring and proactive management plans, including early PEG insertion, should be prioritized to improve patient outcomes.

Gastrostomy Tubes: Indications, Types, and Care.

Gastrostomy tube insertion has become a more common practice in pediatric patients. An increasing number of children both in health-care facilities and at home are relying on temporary or long-term enteral feeding. Gastrostomy tube placement can be accomplished by various methods and by a variety of specialists. Despite the overall safety of these procedures, both early and late complications can occur. It is important for pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists to be familiar with and aware of the indications, safety, and management of gastrostomies. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the topic.

Clinical prognostic factors predicting survival of motor neuron disease patients with gastrostomy: A retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Enteral feeding via gastrostomy is a key intervention to prevent significant weight loss in Motor Neuron Disease (MND). The aim of this study was to explore demographic, clinical, and nutritional factors associated with survival time in MND patients with gastrostomy. METHODS: The retrospective study analyzed 94 MND patients (n = 58 bulbar-onset and n = 36 limb-onset) who underwent gastrostomy between 2015 and 2021. The primary outcome was the survival time from gastrostomy insertion to death. Independent variables of interest explored were: age at gastrostomy insertion, disease onset type, known genetic cause, use of riluzole, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use, forced vital capacity prior to gastrostomy, weight loss from diagnosis to gastrostomy insertion, and body mass index (BMI) at the time of gastrostomy insertion. RESULTS: The median survival time from gastrostomy to death was 357 days (± 29.3, 95%CI: 299.5, 414.5). Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test revealed patients with lower body mass index <18.5 kg/m2 at the time of gastrostomy insertion (p = .023) had shorter survival. Cox proportional hazards model with multivariable adjustment revealed that older age (p = .008), and greater weight loss from diagnosis to gastrostomy (p = .003) were associated with shorter survival time post gastrostomy. Limb onset (p = .023), NIV use not being required (p = .008) and daily NIV use when required and tolerated (p = .033) were associated with longer survival. DISCUSSION: Preventing or minimizing weight loss from MND diagnosis and encouraging NIV use when clinically indicated are modifiable factors that may prolong the survival of MND patients with gastrostomy.

The important role of whole-process computed tomography guidance for percutaneous gastrostomy in esophageal cancer patients who are unsuitable for or have had unsuccessful attempts with endoscopic and fluoroscopic gastrostomy.

PURPOSE: To explore the value of clinical application with the whole process computed tomography (CT) guided percutaneous gastrostomy in esophageal tumor patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 32 esophageal tumor patients in whom endoscopic gastrostomy or fluoroscopy guided gastrostomy were considered too dangerous or impossible due to the esophagus complete obstruction, complicate esophageal mediastinal fistula, esophageal trachea fistula or severe heart disease. All of the 32 patients were included in this study from 2 medical center and underwent the gastrostomy under whole process CT guided. RESULTS: All of the gastrostomy procedure was finished successfully under whole process CT guided and the technical success rate was 100%. The average time for each operation was 27 min. No serious complications occurred and the minor complications occurred in 3 patients, including local infection, severe hyperplasia of granulation tissue and tube dislodgment. There were no procedure related deaths. CONCLUSION: The technical success rate of whole process CT guided percutaneous gastrostomy is high and the complication is low. This technique can be used feasible and effectively in some special patients.

Persistent Ostomy Following Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Removal: Treatment Strategies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to review available literature on management of persistent ostomy following PEG tube removal. We will discuss the incidence of persistent gastrocutaneous fistula (GCF) following PEG tube removal, risk factors for their development, and management strategies that have been proposed and their efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of over the scope clips (OTSC) have evolved recently in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, and fistula closures. OTSC has become more readily available and proven to be effective and safe. Suturing devices have shown promising results. Persistent gastrocutaneous fistula following PEG removal is a rare yet serious complication that can lead to continuous skin irritation and leakage of gastric contents and acid. There are several postulated risk factors but the most important of these is duration of placement. Management can include medical therapy which has recently been shown to be somewhat effective, endoscopic therapy and surgery as a last resort. Overall, the data on GCFs is limited and further study with larger sample size is needed.

Patient characteristics and procedural and safety outcomes of percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing: A nationwide database study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing (PTEG) is an alternative interventional procedure in cases where gastrostomy is not feasible. However, the safety and complication rates of PTEG have not yet been evaluated. We aimed to describe the characteristics of patients who underwent PTEG and investigate complications using a nationwide Japanese inpatient database. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan to identify patients who underwent PTEG from April 2012 to March 2020. The outcomes were the occurrence of complications, invasive treatment within 7 days after PTEG, and tube replacement within 14 days after PTEG. We statistically compared patient background, complication rates, and outcomes using PTEG indications. RESULTS: A total of 3,684 patients underwent PTEG, which was performed in 1,455 patients for decompression and 2,193 patients for feeding. The patients' mean age was 73.1 years, and 62.1% were men. More patients in the decompression group had cancer than those in the feeding group. The overall number of complications was 47 cases (1.3%). The most common treatment administered after PTEG was red blood cell transfusion (3.9%), followed by early tube replacement (3.3%). As invasive treatments for PTEG complications, percutaneous drainage and transcatheter arterial embolization were required in 4 and 1 cases, respectively, and no cases required surgery. CONCLUSION: We performed a descriptive study on PTEG using a nationwide database in Japan. This study also showed a low complication rate after PTEG in the real world. Our findings provide practical information on the safety of PTEG in Japan.

A Multicenter Survey of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in 2019 at Korean Medical Institutions.

Background/Aims: : This study aimed to review the indications, methods, cooperation, complications, and outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Methods: : Questionnaires were sent to 200 hospitals, of which 62 returned their questionnaires, with a response rate of approximately 30%. Descriptive statistics were calculated to analyze the responses to the questionnaires. Results: : In 2019, a total of 1,052 PEGs were performed in 1,017 patients at 62 hospitals. The main group who underwent PEG was older adult patients with brain disease, particularly stroke. Nutritional supply was an important purpose of the PEG procedure. "The pull method" was the most commonly used for initial PEG insertion. The complications related to PEG were mostly mild, with leakage being the most common. Patients who underwent PEG procedures were primarily educated regarding the post-procedure management and complications related to PEG. Preoperative meetings were skipped at >50% of the institutions. Regarding the cooperation between the nutrition support team (NST) and the physician performing PEG, few endoscopists answered that they cooperated with NST before and after PEG. Moreover, the rate of NST certification obtained by physicians performing PEG and the frequency of attendance at NST-related conferences were relatively low. Conclusions: : This study shows a similar trend to that found in the previous PEG guidelines. However, it covers new aspects, including team-based work for PEG procedure, nutrition support, and education for patients and guardians. Therefore, each medical institution needs to select an appropriate method considering the medical environment and doctor's abilities.

Proportion of unplanned tube replacements and complications following gastrostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Gastrostomy feeding represents a vital component of supportive care provided to people with swallowing or feeding difficulties; however, the rate of specific long-term complications is currently unknown in the adult population. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of specific long-term gastrostomy-related complications and unplanned replacements in adults. METHODS: A prospective systematic review of Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases was performed. Key complications of hypergranulation, infection and displacement among studies relevant to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes, radiologically inserted gastrostomy tubes and balloon replacement tubes were critically appraised by two independent reviewers. Results were synthesised quantitatively in a meta-analysis using random effects where the population and condition were sufficiently homogeneous. RESULTS: In total, 453 studies were identified, of which 17 met inclusion criteria. 8.5% of adults with a gastrostomy were found to have had an infection ≥42 days after initial tube insertion (p < 0.01), while 13% had hypergranulation (p < 0.01). Displacement occurred in 10.8% of adults (p < 0.01), with age (p < 0.001) and sex (p < 0.001) presenting as a risk factor (R2 = 75%) following meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 10 people with a gastrostomy will experience a complication related to either hypergranulation, infection or dislodgement. Age, in combination with sex, may provide a guide for risk of displacement among adult female cohorts, though further studies reporting prevalence of gastrostomy-related complications along with participant demographics are required.

Impact of fee-revision policy for gastrostomy on its implementation among older adults with dementia in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the policy to reduce the reimbursement fee for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) on the number of PEG procedures performed among older adults with dementia. STUDY DESIGN: Interrupted time series (ITS). METHODS: We used the monthly aggregated data of the number of PEG procedures in older adults with dementia (both broad and narrow definitions), between 2012 and 2018, from the claims data in Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan. A single ITS design was used to estimate changes in the outcome following each intervention (i.e., first, second, and third interventions performed in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively). A controlled ITS design was applied to estimate the effects after the sequence of interventions (pre-intervention: 2012-2014; post-intervention: 2016-2018). The control group comprised patients with malignant head and neck tumors who underwent PEG procedures outside the scope of this policy restriction. RESULTS: The number of PEG procedures decreased significantly only in the month wherein the third intervention was introduced (broad definition: IRR = 0.11, CI = 0.03-0.49; narrow definition: IRR = 0.15, CI = 0.03-0.75). No significant difference was observed between the treatment and control groups during the post-intervention phase. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of fee-revision policy for PEG on the decrease in PEG procedures among older adults with dementia is remarkably minimal. It is difficult to reduce unnecessary PEG procedures by relying on this financial incentive alone. Policy decision-makers should consider methods to prevent inappropriate use of artificial nutrition for older adults at their end-of-life stage by reforming the health delivery system.

Establishing a Clinical Care Pathway to Expedite Rehabilitation Transitions for Stroke Patients With Dysphagia and Enteral Feeding Needs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a physiatrist-led clinical pathway to expedite rehabilitation transitions for stroke patients with dysphagia requiring nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. DESIGN: This is a retrospective single-center observational study in 426 adults with stroke and dysphagia admitted to the acute hospital. Physican Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) was consulted to determine dysphagia prognosis and candidacy for rehabilitation admission with nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The proportion of patients accepted with nasogastric tube versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, progression to total oral diet during rehabilitation, and lengths of stay were tracked. RESULTS: The rate of recovery to total oral diet for patients accepted with nasogastric tube was 38/44 = 86.3% versus 29/75 = 38.6% with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. There was a significant difference in mean time to total oral diet with nasogastric tube (20.37 days) versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (34.46 days): t (43) = 4.49, P < 0.001. The acute hospital length of stay was significantly shorter with nasogastric tube (12.9 days) versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (20.4 days): t (117) = 4.16, P < 0.001. Rehabilitation length of stay did not differ significantly between groups (26.9 vs. 32.0 days). CONCLUSION: Physiatrist-led initiatives to evaluate stroke patients with dysphagia can expedite rehabilitation transitions, prevent unnecessary invasive procedures, and reduce acute hospital length of stay.

Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing a novel and dedicated device with conventional endoscopic techniques for the treatment of buried bumper syndrome (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is a rare adverse event of PEG tubes. This study compared the newly developed Flamingo device (Fujifilm Medwork GmbH, Höchstadt, Germany) with conventional endoscopic techniques for BBS treatment. METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the Flamingo set (study group) with other endoscopic techniques (control group) for BBS treatment in 6 German hospitals. The primary endpoint was procedure time. Further outcome parameters were technical success, adverse event rate, and number and cost of devices used in each group. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (18 in each group; mean age, 73 years; 12 women) were included in this study between March 2018 and December 2022. Median time since placement of the feeding tube was 30 months. The bumper was located in the gastric corpus in 27 patients, and the internal bumper was completely overgrown in 31 patients. The duration of the removal procedure was 17 minutes (range, 3-72) in the study group compared with 38 minutes (range, 12-111) in the control group (P = .046). The primary technical success rate was 77.8% in the study group and 55.6% in the control group (P = .157), whereas the overall technical success rate was 100% compared with 83.3% (P = .070). Adverse events occurred in 4 patients (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic removal of the buried bumper using the Flamingo device was significantly faster than that with other endoscopic techniques and showed a higher technical success rate. This device may become the endoscopic treatment of choice for BBS. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03186066.).

Synchronous tracheostomy and gastrostomy placement results in shorter length of stay in traumatic brain injury patients.

BACKGROUND: American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) guidelines recommend gastrostomy for patients suspected to require enteral access device for 4-6 weeks. Our hypothesis was that traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients undergoing synchronous tracheostomy/gastrostomy (SYNC) compared to tracheostomy first (DELAY) have shorter length of stay (LOS) but higher rates of unnecessary gastrostomy. METHODS: Retrospective review of TBI patients requiring tracheostomy in 2017-2022 â€‹at a Level 1 trauma center was conducted. SYNC and DELAY patients were compared, and CoxPH analysis was performed for LOS. RESULTS: 394 patients were included [mean age: 42 (SD:18); mortality: 9 â€‹%]. The DELAY group had longer LOS (39 vs 32 days, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). There was no significant difference in unnecessary gastrostomy rate between groups (p â€‹= â€‹0.1331). In adjusted hazard analysis, SYNC predicted shorter LOS (HR:1.54; 95 â€‹% CI:1.20-1.98, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous gastrostomy was associated with shorter length of stay and similar rates of unnecessary gastrostomy in TBI patients.

Accidental late PEG dislodgment in 3 cases with a narrow stoma: Bougie dilatation rescue.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) is a simple and effective method of enteral nutrition in many patients who cannot take oral food. The accidental dislodgement of the PEG tube after the maturation of the gastro-cutaneous fistula (stoma) is called late dislodgement. If it is not detected early, the stoma lumen gets narrower; and does not permit the passage of the replacement tube. In this case, the commonly followed method is to continue enteral nutrition by opening a new gastro-cutaneous fistula after the complete closing of the original stoma. Here, we present a stoma-saving bougie dilatation method in 3 cases with severely narrowed stomas after late accidental dislodgement of the PEG tube.

Gastrojejunal Fistula Following Gastrostomy Tube.

Gastrostomy tubes are often placed in patients with poor voluntary intake, oropharyngeal dysphagia, or chronic illness to provide definitive nutritional access. Despite the widespread use of gastrostomy tubes, some patients can experience complications associated with this procedure including gastrocolic-cutaneous fistula and dislodgement of gastrostomy tube. This case discusses an instance of gastrojejunal fistula formation over one year after gastrostomy tube placement likely due to tube dislodgement. Imaging showed gastrostomy tube traversing the posterior wall of the stomach and creating a fistula into the jejunum, with the balloon inflated within the jejunum. Gastrostomy tube was removed and replaced, with gastrostomy tube study showing no extravasation of contrast. Patient is now doing well-tolerating tube feeds at goal.

To push or to pull? A clinical audit on the efficacy and safety of the pull and push percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in oncological patients.

BACKGROUND: The peroral "pull" technique and the direct "push" procedure are the two main methods for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. Although pull-PEG is generally recommended as the first-line modality, many oncological patients require a push-PEG approach to prevent tumor seeding or overcome tumor-related obstruction. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both PEG procedures in cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive PEG procedures within a tertiary oncological center. Patients were followed up with the hospital databases and National Cancer Registry to assess the technical success rate for PEG placement, the rate of minor and major adverse events (AEs), and 30-day mortality rates. We compared those outcomes between the two PEG techniques. Finally, risk factors for PEG-related adverse events were analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional-hazard regression model adjusted for patients' sex, age, performance status (ECOG), Body Mass Index (BMI), diabetes, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) status (pre-/current-/post-treatment), and type of PEG. RESULTS: We included 1055 PEG procedures (58.7% push-PEG/41.4% pull-PEG) performed in 994 patients between 2014 and 2021 (mean age 62.0 [±10.7] yrs.; 70.2% males; indication: head-and-neck cancer 75.9%/other cancer 24.1%). The overall technical success for PEG placement was 96.5%. Although the "push" technique had a higher rate of all AEs (21.4% vs. 7.1%, Hazard Ratio [HR]  = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.9-4.3, p < 0.001), most of these constituted minor AEs (71.9%), such as tube dislodgement. The methods had no significant difference regarding major AEs and 30-day mortality rates. Previous CRT was associated with an increased risk of major AEs (hazard ratio = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.0-7.2, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: The risk of major AEs was comparable between the push- and pull-PEG techniques in cancer patients. Due to frequent tube dislodgement in push-PEG, the pull technique may be more suitable for long-term feeding. Previous CRT increases the risk of major AEs, favoring early ("prophylactic") PEG placement when such treatment is expected.

The "cut and push" method of removing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is not safe in paediatric patients.

PURPOSE: A "cut and push" (CP) approach has been described in the literature for removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety profile of this method in children. METHOD: Our study included all children who underwent CP procedure for either removal or replacement of Freka PEG tube at our centre between January 2016 and August 2021. Parents contacted to establish if the internal component had been seen in the stools post-procedure. If not seen, a plain film of chest, abdomen and pelvis was arranged followed by computerised tomography (CT) scan. The presence of the internal component as a retained foreign body on imaging was evaluated along with any complication. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients included, six (22.2%) patients had the internal component seen in the stool. Five (18.5%) patients in total had a retained internal component with three (11.1%) patients had major complications requiring complex surgical interventions, and two (7.4%) patients required endoscopic retrieval. CONCLUSION: Our study reports more severe complications that required complex surgical interventions compared to the previous studies. We believe that this method of removal is not safe in children and should be abandoned. Also, patients with Down syndrome might be at higher risk of retention and complications.